Certified Benz & Beemer Compares 2016 Porsche Cayman VS 2016 Jaguar F-Type Near Scottsdale, AZ

Responsive image

2016 Porsche Cayman

Responsive image

2016 Jaguar F-Type

Safety Comparison

The Cayman Auto offers optional Porsche Active Safety, which use forward mounted sensors to warn the driver of a possible collision ahead. If the driver doesn’t react and the system determines a collision is imminent, it automatically applies the brakes at full-force in order to reduce the force of the crash or avoid it altogether. The F-Type doesn't offer collision warning or crash mitigation brakes.

Both the Cayman and the F-Type have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, daytime running lights and available rearview cameras.

Warranty Comparison

The Cayman’s corrosion warranty is 6 years longer than the F-Type’s (12 vs. 6 years).

There are over 33 percent more Porsche dealers than there are Jaguar dealers, which makes it easier should you ever need service under the Cayman’s warranty.

Reliability Comparison

J.D. Power and Associates rated the Cayman second among compact premium sporty cars in their 2015 Initial Quality Study. The F-Type was rated third in its category.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2015 Initial Quality Study of new car owners surveyed provide the statistics that show that Porsche vehicles are better in initial quality than Jaguar vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Porsche first in initial quality, above the industry average. With 13 more problems per 100 vehicles, Jaguar is ranked third.

Engine Comparison

The flat cylinder configuration of the boxer engine in the Cayman lowers its center of gravity, enhancing handling stability. The F-Type doesn’t offer a boxer engine configuration.

Fuel Economy and Range Comparison

On the EPA test cycle the Cayman gets better fuel mileage than the F-Type:




20 city/30 hwy

16 city/24 hwy



20 city/28 hwy

15 city/24 hwy



19 city/26 hwy



18 city/23 hwy



22 city/32 hwy

19 city/28 hwy



21 city/30 hwy

19 city/27 hwy



22 city/31 hwy

15 city/23 hwy

R/Auto AWD

Regenerative brakes improve the Cayman’s fuel efficiency by converting inertia back into energy instead of wasting it. The F-Type doesn’t offer a regenerative braking system.

Brakes and Stopping Comparison

For better stopping power the Cayman GT4’s front brake rotors are larger than those on the F-Type:

Cayman GT4


F-Type S/R

Front Rotors

16.1 inches

14 inches

15.7 inches

Rear Rotors

15.4 inches

12.8 inches

15 inches

The Cayman stops shorter than the F-Type:



80 to 0 MPH

187 feet

196 feet

Road & Track

70 to 0 MPH

146 feet

151 feet

Car and Driver

60 to 0 MPH

97 feet

106 feet

Motor Trend

Suspension and Handling Comparison

The Cayman has standard front and rear gas-charged shocks for better control over choppy roads. The F-Type’s suspension doesn’t offer gas-charged shocks.

The Cayman handles at 1.03 G’s, while the F-Type R Coupé pulls only 1.00 G’s of cornering force in a Car and Driver skidpad test.

The Cayman GT4 executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver quicker than the F-Type R Coupé (23.5 seconds @ .91 average G’s vs. 24.4 seconds @ .82 average G’s).

Chassis Comparison

The Porsche Cayman may be more efficient, handle and accelerate better because it weighs about 550 to 850 pounds less than the Jaguar F-Type.

The Cayman is 3.6 inches shorter than the F-Type, making the Cayman easier to handle, maneuver and park in tight spaces.

The design of the Porsche Cayman amounts to more than styling. The Cayman offers aerodynamic coefficients of drag from .3 to .32 Cd (depending on bodystyle and options). That is significantly lower than the F-Type (.35 to .36). A more efficient exterior helps the Cayman go faster and keeps the interior quieter. It also helps the Cayman get better fuel mileage.

Cargo Capacity Comparison

The Cayman has a much larger trunk than the F-Type Coupé (15 vs. 11.7 cubic feet).

Ergonomics Comparison

The Cayman’s instruments include an oil pressure gauge and a temperature gauge – which could save your engine! Often ‘idiot lights’ don’t warn you until damage has been done. The F-Type does not have an oil pressure gauge.

If the windows are left down on the Cayman the driver can raise them all using the key in the outside lock cylinder; on a hot day the driver can lower the windows. The driver of the F-Type can only operate the windows from inside the vehicle, with the ignition on.

Heated windshield washer nozzles are standard on the Cayman to prevent washer fluid and nozzles from freezing and help continue to keep the windshield clear in sub-freezing temperatures. The F-Type doesn’t offer heated windshield washer nozzles.

To improve rear visibility by keeping the rear window clear, the Cayman offers an optional rear wiper. The F-Type doesn’t offer a rear wiper.

The Cayman’s sun-visors swivel front-to-side to block glare from the side windows. The F-Type’s visors are fixed into the windshield header.

Optional air conditioned seats in the Cayman keep the driver and front passenger comfortable and take the sting out of hot seats in Summer. The F-Type doesn’t offer air conditioned seats.

To keep a safe, consistent following distance, the Cayman Auto offers an optional Adaptive Cruise Control, which alters the speed of the vehicle without driver intervention. This allows the driver to use cruise control more safely without constantly having to disengage it when approaching slower traffic. The F-Type doesn’t offer an adaptive cruise control.

Economic Advantages Comparison

Insurance will cost less for the Cayman owner. The Complete Car Cost Guide estimates that insurance for the Cayman will cost $2300 to $7505 less than the F-Type over a five-year period.

The Cayman will cost the buyer less in the long run because of its superior resale value. Kiplinger’s estimates that the Cayman will retain a greater percentage of its original price after three and five years than the F-Type.



Five Year

41% to 45%

26% to 29%

Three Year

56% to 62%

39% to 44%

Intellichoice estimates that five-year ownership costs (depreciation, financing, insurance, fuel, fees, repairs and maintenance) for the Porsche Cayman will be $17135 to $32686 less than for the Jaguar F-Type.

Recommendations Comparison

J.D. Power and Associates rated the Cayman first among compact premium sporty cars in owner reported satisfaction. This includes how well the vehicle performs and satisfies its owner’s expectations. The F-Type isn’t in the top three in its category.

The Cayman was chosen as one of Car and Driver’s “Top Ten” for 9 of the last 10 years. The F-Type has never been a Car and Driver “Top Ten” pick.

© 1991-2016 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. Who We Are
Click here to view the disclaimers, limitations and notices about EPA fuel mileage, crash tests, coprights, trademarks, and other issues.