Certified Benz & Beemer Compares 2016 Mercedes Benz C-Class VS 2016 Cadillac ATS Near Phoenix, AZ

Responsive image

2016 Mercedes Benz C-Class

Responsive image
VS

2016 Cadillac ATS

Safety Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. RMDYB-MXOUX 162.241.241.35 2020/01/15

For enhanced safety, the front and rear seat shoulder belts of the Mercedes C-Class Sedan have pretensioners to tighten the seatbelts and eliminate dangerous slack in the event of a collision. The Cadillac ATS Sedan doesn’t offer pretensioners for the rear seat belts.

For enhanced safety, the front seat shoulder belts of the Mercedes C-Class Sedan are height-adjustable to accommodate a wide variety of driver and passenger heights. A better fit can prevent injuries and the increased comfort also encourages passengers to buckle up. The Cadillac ATS Sedan doesn’t offer height-adjustable front seat belts.

The C-Class Sedan’s driver alert monitor detects an inattentive driver then sounds a warning and suggests a break. According to the NHTSA, drivers who fall asleep cause about 100,000 crashes and 1500 deaths a year. The ATS Sedan doesn’t offer a driver alert monitor.

Both the C-Class Sedan and the ATS Sedan have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, daytime running lights, front parking sensors, available all wheel drive, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems and rearview cameras.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Mercedes C-Class Sedan is safer than the Cadillac ATS Sedan:

C-Class Sedan

ATS Sedan

Driver

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

HIC

138

202

Neck Injury Risk

24%

26%

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Mercedes C-Class Sedan is safer than the Cadillac ATS Sedan:

C-Class Sedan

ATS Sedan

Front Seat

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

HIC

76

116

Chest Movement

1 inches

1.1 inches

Abdominal Force

147 G’s

210 G’s

Into Pole

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

Max Damage Depth

12 inches

13 inches

Spine Acceleration

43 G’s

43 G’s

Hip Force

769 lbs.

776 lbs.

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

Reliability Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. RMDYB-MXOUX 162.241.241.35 2020/01/15

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2015 Initial Quality Study of new car owners surveyed provide the statistics that show that Mercedes vehicles are better in initial quality than Cadillac vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Mercedes 14th in initial quality, above the industry average. With 11 more problems per 100 vehicles, Cadillac is ranked 21st, below the industry average.

Engine Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. RMDYB-MXOUX 162.241.241.35 2020/01/15

The C-Class Sedan has more powerful engines than the ATS Sedan:

Horsepower

Torque

C300 Sedan 2.0 turbo 4 cyl.

241 HP

273 lbs.-ft.

C450 AMG 3.0 turbo V6

362 HP

384 lbs.-ft.

ATS Sedan 2.5 DOHC 4 cyl.

202 HP

191 lbs.-ft.

ATS Sedan 2.0 turbo 4 cyl.

272 HP

295 lbs.-ft.

ATS Sedan 3.6 DOHC V6

335 HP

285 lbs.-ft.

As tested in Car and Driver the C450 AMG is faster than the Cadillac ATS Sedan V6:

C-Class Sedan

ATS Sedan

Zero to 60 MPH

4.5 sec

5.4 sec

Zero to 100 MPH

11.2 sec

13.3 sec

5 to 60 MPH Rolling Start

5.4 sec

5.7 sec

Quarter Mile

13.1 sec

14 sec

Speed in 1/4 Mile

108 MPH

102 MPH

Fuel Economy and Range Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. RMDYB-MXOUX 162.241.241.35 2020/01/15

On the EPA test cycle the C-Class Sedan gets better fuel mileage than the ATS Sedan:

C-Class Sedan

ATS Sedan

RWD

n/a

20 city/29 hwy

2.0 Turbo/Manual

n/a

22 city/32 hwy

2.5 4 cyl./Auto

C300/Auto

25 city/34 hwy

22 city/31 hwy

2.0 Turbo/Auto

AWD

C300/Auto

24 city/31 hwy

22 city/30 hwy

2.0 Turbo/Auto

C450 AMG/Auto

21 city/29 hwy

19 city/28 hwy

V6/Auto

Regardless of its engine, the C-Class Sedan’s engine automatically turns off when the vehicle is stopped, saving fuel and reducing pollution. (Start/Stop isn’t accounted in present EPA fuel mileage tests.) Cadillac only offers an automatic engine start/stop system on the ATS Sedan 2.0 Turbo/V6.

The C-Class Sedan has 1.4 gallons more fuel capacity than the ATS Sedan (17.4 vs. 16 gallons), for longer range between fill-ups.

Brakes and Stopping Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. RMDYB-MXOUX 162.241.241.35 2020/01/15

For better stopping power the C-Class Sedan’s front brake rotors are larger than those on the ATS Sedan:

C-Class Sedan

C450 AMG

ATS Sedan

ATS Sedan

Front Rotors

13 inches

14.2 inches

11.8 inches

12.6 inches

Rear Rotors

11.8 inches

12.6 inches

12.4 inches

12.4 inches

The C-Class Sedan stops much shorter than the ATS Sedan:

C-Class Sedan

ATS Sedan

70 to 0 MPH

160 feet

164 feet

Car and Driver

60 to 0 MPH

108 feet

124 feet

Motor Trend

Suspension and Handling Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. RMDYB-MXOUX 162.241.241.35 2020/01/15

The C-Class Sedan has a standard automatic load leveling suspension to keep ride height level with a heavy load or when towing. The ATS Sedan doesn’t offer a load leveling suspension.

The C-Class Sedan’s drift compensation steering can automatically compensate for road conditions which would cause the vehicle to drift from side to side, helping the driver to keep the vehicle straight more easily. The ATS Sedan doesn’t offer drift compensation steering.

For a smoother ride and more stable handling, the C-Class Sedan’s wheelbase is 2.5 inches longer than on the ATS Sedan (111.8 inches vs. 109.3 inches).

For better handling and stability, the track (width between the wheels) on the C-Class Sedan is 3 inches wider in the front than on the ATS Sedan.

The C450 AMG 4MATIC handles at .93 G’s, while the ATS Sedan pulls only .83 G’s of cornering force in a Car and Driver skidpad test.

The C300 Sedan 4MATIC executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver quicker than the ATS Sedan (26.3 seconds @ .7 average G’s vs. 26.7 seconds @ .66 average G’s).

Passenger Space Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. RMDYB-MXOUX 162.241.241.35 2020/01/15

The C-Class Sedan has .3 inches more rear headroom and 1.7 inches more rear legroom than the ATS Sedan.

Cargo Capacity Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. RMDYB-MXOUX 162.241.241.35 2020/01/15

The C-Class Sedan has a much larger trunk than the ATS Sedan (12.6 vs. 10.4 cubic feet).

To make loading and unloading groceries and cargo easier when your hands are full, the C-Class Sedan’s trunk can be opened just by kicking your foot under the back bumper, leaving your hands completely free. The C-Class Sedan also offers an optional power trunk, which opens and closes automatically by pressing a button or just by kicking your foot under the back bumper. The ATS Sedan doesn’t offer a power or hands-free opening trunk.

Ergonomics Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. RMDYB-MXOUX 162.241.241.35 2020/01/15

Unlike the driver-only memory system optional at extra cost in the ATS Sedan, the C-Class Sedan offers an optional passenger memory, so that when drivers switch, the memory setting adjusts the driver’s seat, steering wheel position and outside mirror angle and the front passenger seat also adjusts to the new passenger’s preset preferences.

The C-Class Sedan’s standard easy entry system raises the steering wheel and glides the driver’s seat back, making it easier for the driver to get in and out. An easy entry system costs extra on the ATS Sedan.

The C-Class Sedan’s front and rear power windows all open or close with one touch of the switches, making it more convenient at drive-up windows and toll booths, or when talking with someone outside of the car. The ATS Sedan’s rear power window switches have to be held the entire time to close them fully.

If the windows are left down on the C-Class Sedan the driver can raise them all using the key in the outside lock cylinder or the keyless remote; on a hot day the driver can lower the windows. The driver of the ATS Sedan can only operate the windows from inside the vehicle, with the ignition on.

The C-Class Sedan’s rain-sensitive wipers adjust their speed and turn on and off automatically based on the amount of rainfall on the windshield. This allows the driver to concentrate on driving without constantly adjusting the wipers. The ATS Sedan’s standard manually variable intermittent wipers have to be constantly adjusted.

A power rear sunshade is optional in the C-Class Sedan to help block heat and glare for the rear passengers. The ATS Sedan doesn’t offer a rear sunshade.

Optional air conditioned seats in the C-Class Sedan keep the driver and front passenger comfortable and take the sting out of hot seats in Summer. The ATS Sedan doesn’t offer air conditioned seats.

The C-Class Sedan’s optional Active Parking Assist can parallel park or back into a parking spot by itself, with the driver only controlling speed with the brake pedal. The ATS Sedan doesn’t offer an automated parking system.

Economic Advantages Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. RMDYB-MXOUX 162.241.241.35 2020/01/15

The C-Class Sedan will cost the buyer less in the long run because of its superior resale value. Kiplinger’s estimates that the C-Class Sedan will retain a greater percentage of its original price after three and five years than the ATS Sedan.

C-Class Sedan

ATS Sedan

Five Year

33% to 34%

29% to 30%

Three Year

48% to 50%

44% to 45%

Recommendations Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. RMDYB-MXOUX 162.241.241.35 2020/01/15

Both the Mercedes C-Class Sedan and Cadillac ATS Sedan won an award in Kiplinger’s 2015 car issue.

J.D. Power and Associates rated the C-Class Sedan second among compact premium cars in owner reported satisfaction. This includes how well the vehicle performs and satisfies its owner’s expectations. The ATS Sedan isn’t in the top three.

The C-Class Sedan was chosen as one of Automobile Magazine’s “All Stars” in 2015. The ATS has never been an “All Star.”

The Mercedes C-Class outsold the Cadillac ATS by over three to one during the 2015 model year.

© 1991-2016 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. Who We Are
Click here to view the disclaimers, limitations and notices about EPA fuel mileage, crash tests, coprights, trademarks, and other issues.