Certified Benz & Beemer Compares 2015 Mercedes Benz G-Class VS 2015 Land Rover Near Scottsdale, AZ

Responsive image

2015 Mercedes Benz G-Class

Responsive image
VS

2015 Land Rover

Safety Comparison

For enhanced safety, the front and rear seat shoulder belts of the Mercedes G-Class are height-adjustable to accommodate a wide variety of driver and passenger heights. A better fit can prevent injuries and the increased comfort also encourages passengers to buckle up. The Land Rover Range Rover has only front height-adjustable seat belts.

The G-Class has standard NECK-PRO Front Head Restraints, which use a specially designed headrest to protect the driver and front passenger from whiplash. During a rear-end collision, the NECK-PRO Front Head Restraints system moves the headrests forward to prevent neck and spine injuries. The Range Rover doesn’t offer a whiplash protection system.

The G-Class has standard mbrace, which uses a global positioning satellite (GPS) receiver and a cellular system to remotely unlock your doors if you lock your keys in, help track down your vehicle if it’s stolen or send emergency personnel to the scene if any airbags deploy. The Range Rover doesn’t offer a GPS response system, only a navigation computer with no live response for emergencies, so if you’re involved in an accident and you’re incapacitated help may not come as quickly.

Both the G-Class and the Range Rover have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, height-adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, all-wheel drive, traction control and electronic stability systems to prevent skidding.

The Mercedes G-Class weighs 441 to 703 pounds more than the Land Rover Range Rover. The NHTSA advises that heavier vehicles are much safer in collisions than their significantly lighter counterparts.

Warranty Comparison

There are over 77 percent more Mercedes dealers than there are Land Rover dealers, which makes it much easier should you ever need service under the G-Class’ warranty.

Reliability Comparison

The G-Class has a solid front axle with a floating power axle for durability that the Range Rover’s independent front suspension and exposed front driveshafts don’t offer.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2014 Initial Quality Study of new car owners surveyed provide the statistics that show that Mercedes vehicles are better in initial quality than Land Rover vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Mercedes 13th in initial quality, above the industry average. With 12 more problems per 100 vehicles, Land Rover is ranked 22nd, below the industry average.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2014 survey of the owners of three-year-old vehicles provides the long-term dependability statistics that show that Mercedes vehicles are more reliable than Land Rover vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Mercedes second in reliability, above the industry average. With 75 more problems per 100 vehicles, Land Rover is ranked 29th.

Engine Comparison

The G550’s standard 5.5 DOHC V8 produces 42 more horsepower (382 vs. 340) and 59 lbs.-ft. more torque (391 vs. 332) than the Range Rover’s standard 3.0 supercharged V6. The G63’s standard 5.5 turbo V8 produces 26 more horsepower (536 vs. 510) and 99 lbs.-ft. more torque (560 vs. 461) than the Range Rover Supercharged/Autobiography’s standard 5.0 supercharged V8.

Brakes and Stopping Comparison

The G-Class stops much shorter than the Range Rover:

G-Class

Range Rover

80 to 0 MPH

219 feet

231 feet

Road & Track

60 to 0 MPH

123 feet

126 feet

Road & Track

Tires and Wheels Comparison

For better traction, the G-Class has larger standard tires than the Range Rover (265/60R18 vs. 235/65R19).

The G550’s standard tires provide better handling because they have a lower 60 series profile (height to width ratio) that provides a stiffer sidewall than the Range Rover’s standard 65 series tires.

The G-Class has a standard full size spare so your trip isn’t interrupted by a flat. A full size spare costs extra on the Range Rover Without the option you must depend on a temporary spare, which limits mileage and speed before replacement.

Chassis Comparison

The G550 is 10.3 inches shorter than the Range Rover, making the G-Class easier to handle, maneuver and park in tight spaces.

The G-Class is 5.1 inches narrower than the Range Rover, making the G-Class easier to handle and maneuver in traffic.

As tested by Car and Driver while at idle, the interior of the G550 is quieter than the Range Rover Supercharged (45 vs. 46 dB).

Cargo Capacity Comparison

The G-Class has a much larger cargo area with its rear seat up than the Range Rover with its rear seat up (45.2 vs. 32.1 cubic feet). The G-Class has a much larger cargo area with its rear seat folded than the Range Rover with its rear seat folded (79.5 vs. 71.7 cubic feet).

Ergonomics Comparison

Heated windshield washer fluid is standard on the G-Class to defrost the washer nozzles and quickly clear ice and frost from the windshield without scraping. The Range Rover doesn’t offer heated windshield washer fluid.

The G-Class’ standard air conditioned front seats cool the driver and front passenger and help take the sting out of hot leather in Summer. Air conditioned front seats cost extra on the Range Rover, and are not available on all models.

Economic Advantages Comparison

The G-Class will cost the buyer less in the long run because of its superior resale value. The Intellichoice estimates that the G-Class will retain 51.56% to 53.25% of its original price after five years, while the Range Rover only retains 45.19% to 47.29%.

© 1991-2016 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. Who We Are
Click here to view the disclaimers, limitations and notices about EPA fuel mileage, crash tests, coprights, trademarks, and other issues.