Certified Benz & Beemer Compares 2015 Ford Taurus VS 2015 Mazda 6 Near Scottsdale, AZ

Responsive image

2015 Ford Taurus

Responsive image
VS

2015 Mazda 6

Safety Comparison

The Taurus offers all-wheel drive to maximize traction under poor conditions, especially in ice and snow. The Mazda 6 doesn’t offer all-wheel drive.

The Taurus Limited/SHO’s optional driver alert monitor detects an inattentive driver then sounds a warning and suggests a break. According to the NHTSA, drivers who fall asleep cause about 100,000 crashes and 1500 deaths a year. The Mazda 6 doesn’t offer a driver alert monitor.

Compared to metal, the Taurus’ plastic fuel tank can withstand harder, more intrusive impacts without leaking; this decreases the possibility of fire. The Mazda 6 has a metal gas tank.

Both the Taurus and the Mazda 6 have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, front-wheel drive, height-adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control and electronic stability systems to prevent skidding.

The Ford Taurus weighs 583 to 1144 pounds more than the Mazda 6. The NHTSA advises that heavier cars are much safer in collisions than their significantly lighter counterparts.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Ford Taurus is safer than the Mazda 6:

Taurus

Mazda 6

OVERALL STARS

5 Stars

4 Stars

Driver

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

HIC

182

187

Leg Forces (l/r)

68/69 lbs.

117/289 lbs.

Passenger

STARS

5 Stars

4 Stars

HIC

218

309

Chest Compression

.5 inches

.7 inches

Neck Injury Risk

32%

42%

Neck Stress

145 lbs.

189 lbs.

Neck Compression

24 lbs.

160 lbs.

Leg Forces (l/r)

316/229 lbs.

409/197 lbs.

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH, results indicate that the Ford Taurus is safer than the Mazda 6:

Taurus

Mazda 6

Front Seat

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

HIC

103

154

Abdominal Force

173 G’s

256 G’s

Hip Force

337 lbs.

437 lbs.

Rear Seat

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

HIC

284

356

Spine Acceleration

30 G’s

64 G’s

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

Warranty Comparison

There are almost 6 times as many Ford dealers as there are Mazda dealers, which makes it much easier should you ever need service under the Taurus’ warranty.

Reliability Comparison

The Taurus has a standard “limp home system” to keep drivers from being stranded if most or all of the engine’s coolant is lost. The engine will run on only half of its cylinders at a time, reduce its power and light a warning lamp on the dashboard so the driver can get to a service station for repairs. The Mazda 6 doesn’t offer a lost coolant limp home mode, so a coolant leak could strand you or seriously damage the car’s engine.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2014 Initial Quality Study of new car owners surveyed provide the statistics that show that Ford vehicles are better in initial quality than Mazda vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Ford 16th in initial quality. With 23 more problems per 100 vehicles, Mazda is ranked 28th.

Engine Comparison

The Taurus’ optional 2.0 turbo 4 cyl. produces 56 more horsepower (240 vs. 184) and 85 lbs.-ft. more torque (270 vs. 185) than the Mazda 6’s 2.5 DOHC 4 cyl. The Taurus’ standard 3.5 DOHC V6 produces 104 more horsepower (288 vs. 184) and 69 lbs.-ft. more torque (254 vs. 185) than the Mazda 6’s 2.5 DOHC 4 cyl. The Taurus SHO’s standard 3.5 turbo V6 produces 181 more horsepower (365 vs. 184) and 165 lbs.-ft. more torque (350 vs. 185) than the Mazda 6’s 2.5 DOHC 4 cyl.

As tested in Motor Trend the Ford Taurus is faster than the Mazda 6 (automatics tested):

Taurus V6

Taurus SHO

Mazda 6

Zero to 30 MPH

2.5 sec

1.8 sec

2.6 sec

Zero to 60 MPH

6.6 sec

5.2 sec

7.7 sec

Zero to 80 MPH

11.1 sec

8.4 sec

13.2 sec

Passing 45 to 65 MPH

3.4 sec

n/a

4 sec

Quarter Mile

15.1 sec

13.7 sec

16 sec

Speed in 1/4 Mile

95 MPH

103 MPH

87.9 MPH

Fuel Economy and Range Comparison

The Taurus has 2.6 gallons more fuel capacity than the Mazda 6 (19 vs. 16.4 gallons), for longer range between fill-ups.

The Taurus has a standard cap-less fueling system. The fuel filler is automatically opened when the fuel nozzle is inserted and automatically closed when it’s removed. This eliminates the need to unscrew and replace the cap and it reduces fuel evaporation, which causes pollution. The Mazda 6 doesn’t offer a cap-less fueling system.

Brakes and Stopping Comparison

For better stopping power the Taurus’ brake rotors are larger than those on the Mazda 6:

Taurus

Mazda 6

Front Rotors

13.86 inches

11.7 inches

Rear Rotors

13.58 inches

10.9 inches

The Taurus SHO’s standard front and rear disc brakes are vented to help dissipate heat for shorter stops with less fading. The rear discs on the Mazda 6 are solid, not vented.

The Taurus stops shorter than the Mazda 6:

Taurus

Mazda 6

70 to 0 MPH

168 feet

174 feet

Car and Driver

Tires and Wheels Comparison

For better traction, the Taurus has larger standard tires than the Mazda 6 (235/60R17 vs. 225/55R17). The Taurus Limited’s tires are larger than the largest tires available on the Mazda 6 (255/45R19 vs. 225/55R17).

For better ride, handling and brake cooling the Taurus offers optional 20-inch wheels. The Mazda 6’s largest wheels are only 19-inches.

Suspension and Handling Comparison

The Taurus SHO’s drift compensation steering can automatically compensate for road conditions which would cause the vehicle to drift from side to side, helping the driver to keep the vehicle straight more easily. The Mazda 6 doesn’t offer drift compensation steering.

For a smoother ride and more stable handling, the Taurus’ wheelbase is 1.5 inches longer than on the Mazda 6 (112.9 inches vs. 111.4 inches).

For better handling and stability, the track (width between the wheels) on the Taurus is 2.7 inches wider in the front and 3.3 inches wider in the rear than the average track on the Mazda 6.

The Taurus SHO AWD handles at .88 G’s, while the Mazda 6 Grand Touring pulls only .83 G’s of cornering force in a Road & Track skidpad test.

The Taurus SHO AWD executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver quicker than the Mazda 6 Touring (26.8 seconds @ .7 average G’s vs. 27.6 seconds @ .62 average G’s).

Chassis Comparison

As tested by Car and Driver while under full throttle, the interior of the Taurus SHO AWD is quieter than the Mazda 6 Grand Touring (73 vs. 80 dB).

Passenger Space Comparison

Because it has more passenger and cargo room, the Taurus is rated a Large car by the EPA, while the Mazda 6 is rated a Mid-size.

The Taurus has 2.5 cubic feet more passenger volume than the Mazda 6 (102.2 vs. 99.7).

The Taurus has .6 inches more front headroom, .2 inches more front hip room, .8 inches more front shoulder room, .7 inches more rear headroom and 1.4 inches more rear shoulder room than the Mazda 6.

Cargo Capacity Comparison

The Taurus has a much larger trunk than the Mazda 6 (20.1 vs. 14.8 cubic feet).

A standard locking glovebox keeps your small valuables safer in the Taurus. The Mazda 6 doesn’t offer locking storage for small valuables.

Ergonomics Comparison

The Taurus Limited/SHO’s standard easy entry system raises the steering wheel and glides the driver’s seat back when the door is unlocked or the ignition is switched off, making it easier for the driver to get in and out. The Mazda 6 doesn’t offer an easy entry system.

The power windows standard on both the Taurus and the Mazda 6 have locks to prevent small children from operating them. When the lock on the Taurus is engaged the driver can still operate all of the windows, for instance to close one opened by a child. The Mazda 6 prevents the driver from operating the other windows just as it does the other passengers.

On a hot day the Taurus’ driver can lower the front windows using the key in the outside lock cylinder or the keyless remote (Taurus Limited/SHO). The driver of the Mazda 6 can only operate the windows from inside the vehicle, with the ignition on.

In case you lock your keys in your vehicle, or don’t have them with you, you can let yourself in using the Taurus’ exterior keypad. The Mazda 6 doesn’t offer an exterior keypad entry system.

The Taurus has a standard automatic headlight on/off feature. When the ignition is on, the headlights automatically turn on at dusk and off after dawn. When the ignition turns off, the headlights turn off after a delay timed to allow you to securely get to your front door. The Mazda 6 only offers an automatic headlight on/off feature as an extra cost option.

A power rear sunshade is optional in the Taurus Limited/SHO to help block heat and glare for the rear passengers. The Mazda 6 doesn’t offer a rear sunshade.

Both the Taurus and the Mazda 6 offer available heated front seats. The Taurus Limited/SHO also offers optional heated rear seats to keep those passengers extremely comfortable in the winter. Heated rear seats aren’t available in the Mazda 6.

The Taurus Limited/SHO’s standard air conditioned front seats cool the driver and front passenger and help take the sting out of hot leather in Summer. The Mazda 6 doesn’t offer air conditioned front seats.

On extremely cold Winter days, the Taurus Limited/SHO’s optional heated steering wheel provides comfort, allowing the driver to steer safely and comfortably before the car heater warms up. The Mazda 6 doesn’t offer a heated steering wheel.

Both the Taurus and the Mazda 6 offer rear vents. For greater rear passenger comfort, the Taurus has standard rear air conditioning vents to keep rear occupants cool in summer or warm in winter. The Mazda 6 doesn’t offer rear air conditioning vents, only heat vents.

The Taurus Limited/SHO’s optional Active Park Assist can parallel park or back into a parking spot by itself, with the driver only controlling speed with the brake pedal. The Mazda 6 doesn’t offer an automated parking system.

Recommendations Comparison

The Ford Taurus outsold the Mazda 6 by 28% during the 2014 model year.

© 1991-2016 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. Who We Are
Click here to view the disclaimers, limitations and notices about EPA fuel mileage, crash tests, coprights, trademarks, and other issues.