Certified Benz & Beemer Compares 2013 Porsche CAYENNE VS 2013 Land Rover Near Phoenix, AZ

Responsive image

2013 Porsche CAYENNE

Responsive image
VS

2013 Land Rover

Safety Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. RMDYB-MXOUX 162.241.241.35 2020/07/25

The Cayenne offers an optional collision warning system, which detects an impending crash through forward mounted sensors and flashes a bright light and sounds a loud, distinctive tone to warn the driver to brake or maneuver immediately to avoid a collision. The system also pre-charges the brakes to begin deceleration more quickly. The Range Rover Evoque doesn't offer a collision warning system.

The Porsche Cayenne has Daytime Running Lights to help keep it more visible under all conditions. Canadian government studies show that driving with lights during the day reduces accidents by 11% by making vehicles more conspicuous. The Range Rover Evoque doesn’t offer Daytime Running Lights.

Both the Cayenne and the Range Rover Evoque have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, all wheel drive, traction control and electronic stability systems to prevent skidding.

The Porsche Cayenne weighs 496 to 1426 pounds more than the Range Rover Evoque. The NHTSA advises that heavier vehicles are much safer in collisions than their significantly lighter counterparts.

Warranty Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. RMDYB-MXOUX 162.241.241.35 2020/07/25

The Cayenne’s corrosion warranty is 4 years longer than the Range Rover Evoque’s (10 vs. 6 years).

There are over 14 percent more Porsche dealers than there are Land Rover dealers, which makes it easier should you ever need service under the Cayenne’s warranty.

Engine Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. RMDYB-MXOUX 162.241.241.35 2020/07/25

The Cayenne’s standard 3.6 DOHC V6 produces 60 more horsepower (300 vs. 240) and 45 lbs.-ft. more torque (295 vs. 250) than the Range Rover Evoque’s 2.0 turbo 4 cyl. The Cayenne Hybrid’s standard 3.0 supercharged V6 hybrid produces 140 more horsepower (380 vs. 240) and 178 lbs.-ft. more torque (428 vs. 250) than the Range Rover Evoque’s 2.0 turbo 4 cyl. The Cayenne S’ standard 4.8 DOHC V8 produces 160 more horsepower (400 vs. 240) and 119 lbs.-ft. more torque (369 vs. 250) than the Range Rover Evoque’s 2.0 turbo 4 cyl. The Cayenne GTS’ standard 4.8 DOHC V8 produces 180 more horsepower (420 vs. 240) and 130 lbs.-ft. more torque (380 vs. 250) than the Range Rover Evoque’s 2.0 turbo 4 cyl. The Cayenne Turbo’s standard 4.8 turbo V8 produces 260 more horsepower (500 vs. 240) and 266 lbs.-ft. more torque (516 vs. 250) than the Range Rover Evoque’s 2.0 turbo 4 cyl.

The Cayenne’s 3.0 turbo V6 diesel produces 156 lbs.-ft. more torque (406 vs. 250) than the Range Rover Evoque’s 2.0 turbo 4 cyl.

As tested in Motor Trend the Cayenne Hybrid is faster than the Range Rover Evoque (automatics tested):

Cayenne

Range Rover Evoque

Zero to 60 MPH

5.6 sec

7 sec

Quarter Mile

14.3 sec

15.3 sec

Speed in 1/4 Mile

95.7 MPH

91 MPH

Fuel Economy and Range Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. RMDYB-MXOUX 162.241.241.35 2020/07/25

In heavy traffic or at stoplights the Cayenne Automatic’s engine automatically turns off when the vehicle is stopped, saving fuel and reducing pollution. The engine is automatically restarted when the driver gets ready to move again. (Start/Stop isn’t accounted in present EPA fuel mileage tests.) The Range Rover Evoque doesn’t offer an automatic engine start/stop system.

The Cayenne V6’s standard fuel tank has 3.9 gallons more fuel capacity than the Range Rover Evoque (22.4 vs. 18.5 gallons), for longer range between fill-ups. The Cayenne Turbo/Diesel’s standard fuel tank has 7.9 gallons more fuel capacity than the Range Rover Evoque (26.4 vs. 18.5 gallons).

Brakes and Stopping Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. RMDYB-MXOUX 162.241.241.35 2020/07/25

For better stopping power the Cayenne’s brake rotors are larger than those on the Range Rover Evoque:

Cayenne V6 Manual

Cayenne Auto

Cayenne Turbo Opt.

Range Rover Evoque

Front Rotors

13.8 inches

14.2 inches

16.5 inches

11.8 inches

Rear Rotors

13 inches

13 inches

14.57 inches

11.9 inches

The Cayenne’s standard front and rear disc brakes are vented to help dissipate heat for shorter stops with less fading. The rear discs on the Range Rover Evoque are solid, not vented.

The Cayenne offers optional heat-treated ceramic brake rotors, which last ten to twenty times as long as conventional cast iron rotors, don’t rust, don’t fade during repeated high speed braking, and their lighter weight contribute to better braking, handling and acceleration. The Range Rover Evoque doesn’t offer ceramic brake rotors.

The Cayenne stops much shorter than the Range Rover Evoque:

Cayenne

Range Rover Evoque

70 to 0 MPH

151 feet

165 feet

Car and Driver

60 to 0 MPH

106 feet

128 feet

Motor Trend

Tires and Wheels Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. RMDYB-MXOUX 162.241.241.35 2020/07/25

For better traction, the Cayenne has larger standard tires than the Range Rover Evoque (255/55R18 vs. 235/55R19). The Cayenne’s optional tires are larger than the largest tires available on the Range Rover Evoque (295/35R21 vs. 245/45R20).

The Cayenne’s optional tires provide better handling because they have a lower 35 series profile (height to width ratio) that provides a stiffer sidewall than the Range Rover Evoque’s optional 45 series tires.

For better ride, handling and brake cooling the Cayenne offers optional 21-inch wheels. The Range Rover Evoque’s largest wheels are only 20-inches.

Suspension and Handling Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. RMDYB-MXOUX 162.241.241.35 2020/07/25

The Cayenne (except Hybrid) offers active sway bars, which help keep it flat and controlled during cornering, but disconnect at lower speeds to smooth the ride and offer greater off-road suspension articulation. This helps keep the tires glued to the road on-road and off. The Range Rover Evoque doesn’t offer an active sway bar system.

The Cayenne offers an available adjustable active suspension system, which counteracts cornering forces actively, limiting body roll and improving handling and stability. Land Rover doesn’t offer an active suspension on the Range Rover Evoque.

For a smoother ride and more stable handling, the Cayenne’s wheelbase is 9.2 inches longer than on the Range Rover Evoque (114 inches vs. 104.8 inches).

For better handling and stability, the track (width between the wheels) on the Cayenne is 1.3 inches wider in the front and 1.6 inches wider in the rear than on the Range Rover Evoque.

The Cayenne’s front to rear weight distribution is more even (52.6% to 47.4%) than the Range Rover Evoque’s (58% to 42%). This gives the Cayenne more stable handling and braking.

The Cayenne GTS handles at .95 G’s, while the Range Rover Evoque 5-Door pulls only .83 G’s of cornering force in a Car and Driver skidpad test.

The Cayenne Turbo executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver 2.9 seconds quicker than the Range Rover Evoque 5-Door (24.8 seconds @ .81 average G’s vs. 27.7 seconds @ .66 average G’s).

For greater off-road capability the Cayenne has a greater minimum ground clearance than the Range Rover Evoque (8.7 vs. 8.3 inches), allowing the Cayenne to travel over rougher terrain without being stopped or damaged. The Cayenne Turbo’s minimum ground clearance is 2.45 inches higher than on the Range Rover Evoque (10.75 vs. 8.3 inches).

Chassis Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. RMDYB-MXOUX 162.241.241.35 2020/07/25

As tested by Car and Driver while cruising at 70 MPH, the interior of the Cayenne Turbo is quieter than the Range Rover Evoque 5-Door (69 vs. 72 dB).

Passenger Space Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. RMDYB-MXOUX 162.241.241.35 2020/07/25

For enhanced passenger comfort on long trips the Cayenne’s rear seats recline. The Range Rover Evoque’s rear seats don’t recline.

Cargo Capacity Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. RMDYB-MXOUX 162.241.241.35 2020/07/25

The Cayenne has a much larger cargo area with its rear seat up than the Range Rover Evoque 5-Door with its rear seat up (23.7 vs. 20.3 cubic feet). The Cayenne has a much larger cargo area with its rear seat folded than the Range Rover Evoque 5-Door with its rear seat folded (62.9 vs. 51 cubic feet).

A low lift-over cargo hatch design makes loading and unloading the Cayenne easier. The Cayenne’s cargo hatch lift-over height is 25.5 inches, while the Range Rover Evoque’s liftover is 28.7 inches.

The Cayenne’s cargo area is larger than the Range Rover Evoque’s in every dimension:

Cayenne

Range Rover Evoque

Length to seat (2nd/1st)

36.2”/70.7”

31.3”/62.2”

Min Width

45.5”

39.2”

Height

35.5”

27.5”

A standard locking glovebox (which can’t be accessed with the valet key) keeps your small valuables safer in the Cayenne. The Range Rover Evoque doesn’t offer locking storage for small valuables.

The Cayenne’s rear cargo window opens separately from the rest of the liftgate door to allow quicker loading of small packages. The Range Rover Evoque’s rear cargo window doesn’t open.

© 1991-2016 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. Who We Are
Click here to view the disclaimers, limitations and notices about EPA fuel mileage, crash tests, coprights, trademarks, and other issues.